Environmentalists attending a day-long seminar Wednesday on
coastal erosion said more challenges could be coming to the state's
beachfront management laws, including a ban on sea walls.
Whether the ban is constitutional was not decided in a recent
lawsuit brought by six property owners on Daufuskie Island, said
Jimmy Chandler, a Georgetown resident who is head of the S.C.
Environmental Law Project.
The lawsuit was settled before the issue was fully decided.
The ban, which has been in place since 1988, was said to infringe
on the residents' rights to protect their property, Chandler
said.
In March, a judge said the Daufuskie Island homeowners could keep
the sea walls but must remove them if there are other permitted ways
to protect their property.
The Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management probably will
be sued on the issue again, Chandler said.
Chandler was among a group of scientists and environmentalists
who attended the program sponsored by the North Inlet-Winyah Bay
Estuarine Research Reserve.
Chandler was involved with the Daufuskie lawsuit and has fought
other battles concerning the state's beaches.
Chandler warned about other possible battles brewing along the
coast. Disputes could arise over constantly shifting coastal
property lines - lots growing bigger or smaller depending on tides
and storms that change the mean high water mark, he said. The mean
high water mark is considered the area where coastal property lines
begin. The mark is the place on shore where spring high tides
normally reach over certain periods of time.
"Mean high water marks are always changing," Chandler said. "You
may be constantly at war with your neighbor."
The S.C Beachfront Management Act has changed in the past decade,
Chandler said. The act once said property owners could not build on
oceanfront lots that were considered unsafe. Today, property owners
must only be informed they are taking a risk by building too close
to the ocean, he said.
The owners do not always pay attention. Chanlder gave an example
of a retired executive who "had waves beating under his house." The
man was denied permission to sandbag his lot, Chandler said.
The attendees, including local property owners, ended the day
with a trip to the south end of Pawleys Island, an area threatened
by erosion.
The creek is being considered for dredging and the beach for
renourishment.
The state uses public money to renourish beaches that have
significant public access.
DeBordieu Colony residents have not received permission to take
sand from a sandbar in public waters in North Inlet to renourish its
beach.
The gated community on the Waccamaw Neck wants to use 200,000
cubic yards of the sand to replenish its eroding beach.